Notifications
Which performance was more surprising:
Noah Lyles' (albeit fraudulent) 18.90 sec in the 200m or Michael Norman's first sub-10 of 9.86 sec in the 100m?
This topic was modified 7 months ago by Anthony Foster
Which performance was more surprising:
Noah Lyles' (albeit fraudulent) 18.90 sec in the 200m or Michael Norman's first sub-10 of 9.86 sec in the 100m?
Currently viewing this topic 1 guest.
Latest Post: To Tokyo or Not to Tokyo? Our newest member: tania11 Recent Posts Unread Posts Tags
Forum Icons: Forum contains no unread posts Forum contains unread posts Mark all read
Topic Icons: Not Replied Replied Active Hot Sticky Unapproved Solved Private Closed